Legal Opinion

In re Meyer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 7, 1979No. Appeal No. 79-505PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) sustaining the examiner’s rejection of claims 2-6, and 9-12, of application serial No. 557,296, filed 11 March 1975, for “Process for the Preparation of 2-Nitrobenzaldehyde and Intermediates Therefor.” We reverse.

Background

The Invention

The compound, 2-nitrobenzaldehyde, has been known for more than 80 years. It can be used, inter alia, as an intermediate in the production of the pharmaceutically active 4-nitrophenyl-l, 4-dihydropyridine derivatives. Appellant’s invention resides…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re PearsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Application of Arthur v. HughesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of Max J. KalmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. In re MarshallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  5. In re EcherdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API