Legal Opinion

Bisi v. American Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 16, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

This action is to recover upon an automobile collision insurance policy. The principal question is whether the trial court erred in concluding that the policy covered the automobile which was damaged.

The plaintiff was a dealer in used cars. On October 29, 1948, the defendants issued to him an automobile dealers’ policy, insuring him for one year against loss by reason of “collision or upset,” in which the coverage clause, in so far as it is relevant to the case, read as follows: “1. Coverage. The policy designated above covers automobiles owned by the insured and held for sale or used in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ives v. City of WillimanticSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. Tuohey v. MartinjakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Allen v. Berkshire Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Peterson v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Lockwood v. HelfantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Seaboard Burner Corporation v. DeLongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Moran v. BensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. New Haven Water Co. v. Town of North BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Saludes v. RamosDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API