Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Linnane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

At issue on this appeal is whether petitioner, decedent’s son and ancillary executor of her estate, has overcome the statutory presumption that certain joint bank accounts established by decedent were intended to vest property rights in his only sibling, Kathleen Linnane, the person named as joint account holder (Banking Law § 675), thereby constituting testamentary substitutes that pass outside the will. Compliance with the statutory requirements of Banking Law § 675 is not at issue on this appeal. To succeed, the law requires petitioner to establish, by clear and…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Morse Shoe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Kleinberg v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. In re the Estate of FilfileyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  4. Hoffstaedter v. Carlton Auto Supplies Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. In re the Estate of CoddingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lenczycki v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Sperrazza v. KailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Estate of StalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Kettler v. Security National Bank of Sioux CityCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2011
  5. Lopez v. FennAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API