Briggs v. Watson
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.
This was, primarily, an action for the specific performance" of a contract, in which the appellant was plaintiff, and the appellees* who are husband and wife, were defendants.
To an amended complaint in three paragraphs the appellees demurred, separately and severally as to each paragraph thereof, which demurrers were by the court sustained. The appellant now prosecutes this appeal and has assigned said ruling as error.
The paragraphs of complaint are each quite lengthy and it is not necessary that they be set out in full. The material averments of the first paragraph were, in substance, that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Jenkins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Campbell v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Kopp v. ReiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Highland Investment Co. v. the Kirk Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1933