Legal Opinion
McLarty v. Borough of Ramsey
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 9, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 1097-57PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
In this action, brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (1952), plaintiffs, owners of real estate in the defendant Borough, seek a declaration that a zoning ordinance, originally adopted by the Borough’s governing body in 1936 and several times subsequently amended, deprives the plaintiffs of property without due process of law contrary to the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The plaintiffs further seek to enjoin the defendant Borough from enforcing this ordinance as it applies to the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American University Park Citizens Ass'n v. BurkaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Steel Hill Development, Inc. v. Town of SanborntonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1971
- Thomas v. City of San MarcosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Ethicon, Inc. v. American Cyanamid CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
- Reed v. City of BartlesvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.