Legal Opinion
Reed v. City of Bartlesville
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 13, 1973No. 44144PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY, Presiding Judge:
The issue in this case is whether the plaintiffs’ petition as amended pleads an actual controversy under the Oklahoma Declaratory Judgment Act, 12 O.S.1971, §§ *10141651-1657. The trial court sustained a demurrer and dismissed the action on the ground that it did not.
The petition alleges in substance that plaintiffs own or hold title to land located in an area the use of which is regulated by an airport zoning ordinance purportedly enacted pursuant to 3 O.S.1971, §§ 101-115 by an airport zoning board. The plaintiffs claim that the ordinance decreases the value of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Knowlton v. Ripley County Memorial HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. Okla. Tax Comm'rCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 2 TULSA COUNTY v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONERCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018