Legal Opinion
Perry H. Gentzel and Foster Engineering Company v. Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 1956No. 205, Docket 23666PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Perry H. Gentzel, the pat-entee of the two patents in suit, and Foster Engineering Company, the exclusive licensee under the patents, recovered judgment in the court below holding the claims of the patents valid and infringed and awarding an injunction and accounting for damages. A claim for alleged breach of confidential relations was dismissed. Only defendant appeals.
Gentzel reissue patent %2,161t
Gentzel reissue patent 22,164 for a “Valve Mechanism” was issued August 25, 1942, upon reissue application filed July 24, 1940; the original patent, 2,145,870, was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Jungersen v. BadenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vermont Structural Slate Company, Inc. v. Tatko Brothers Slate Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Martin-Marietta Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Anderson Company and Productive Inventions, Inc. v. Trico Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Delamere Company v. Taylor-Bell Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Savoy Leather Manufacturing Corporation v. Standard Brief Case Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.