Norriega v. MacHado
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
In this appeal, we consider whether appellants are barred by the doctrine of res judi-cata from maintaining an action challenging the constitutionality of Arizona’s forfeiture statutes. Because neither appellant was a party in the prior forfeiture proceedings, we hold that res judicata does not bar their action.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This is an appeal from the grant of a motion to dismiss. We therefore consider all material facts as alleged in the complaint to be true. See Anson v. American Motors Corp., 155 Ariz. 420, 421, 747 P.2d 581, 582 (App.1987).
A. Appellant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anson v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Aldabbagh v. Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses & ControlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Aldrich and Steinberger v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Fitzgerald v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brink Electric Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- William Platt v. Jason MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- State v. One Single Family Residence At 1810 East Second AvenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.