Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Martin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 27, 2014No. CV-14-806PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul E. Danielson, Associate Justice

| petitioner Jackson Thomas Stephens Jr. brings this original action pursuant -to Arkansas Constitution article 5, section 1, and amendment 80, section 2(D)(4), challenging the sufficiency of a statewide initiative petition. He asks this court to enjoin respondent Mark Martin, Secretary of State (“Secretary of State”), from placing the initiated act known as “An Act to Increase the Arkansas Minimum Wage,” or Issue No. 5, on the November 4, 2014 general-election ballot or, alternatively, from certifying any ballots cast for it. The proposed act is sponsored by intervenor Stephen Copley,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Ferrell v. KeelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Dixon v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Ward v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benca v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Zook v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Arkansans for Healthy Eyes, a Ballot Question Committee; And Vicki Farmer, Individually and on Behalf of Arkansans for Healthy Eyes v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Arkansas; Safe Surgery Arkansas, a Ballot Question Committee; And Laurie Barber, M.D., Individually and on Behalf of Safe Surgery Arkansas, an Original ActionrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Benca v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Benca v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API