Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hoagland v. Kamp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1990Published

1DissentCasey, J.

The locality rule has its roots in Pike v. Honsinger (155 NY 201), where the Court of Appeals said that a doctor is required to possess "that reasonable degree of learning and skill * * * ordinarily possessed by physicians and surgeons in the locality where he practices” (supra, at 209). It is now firmly established that "in most medical malpractice actions, a plaintiff must prove through expert medical opinion (1) the standard of care in the locality where treatment occurred, (2) that defendant breached that standard of care and (3) that the breach of the standard was the proximate cause of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Toth v. Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Gibson v. D'AmicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Riley v. WiemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. McGinn v. SellittiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API