Emkee v. Ahston
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Steele county by the purchasers of ■certain land to determine the adverse claims of the defendants. The case was tried before Childress, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor or plaintiffs. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, Celia Thietje, and other children of Jacob Kruger and his wife who were named in the deed mentioned in the first paragraph of the opinion, appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Action to determine adverse claims to real property. Plaintiff had judgment and defendants appealed.
There is no controversy about the facts and they are substantially as follows: Jacob Kruger was the owner of the land, a farm consisting of 80 acres, upon which he had resided with his family for many years. On September 5, 1911, he conveyed the same, his wife joining therein, to his son Albert C. Kruger, in consideration of an agreement by the grantee to pay to the grantors the sum of $200 annually thereafter during the remainder of their lives, and to furnish them, or the survivor, each year…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bruer v. BruerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Walton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Strothers v. WoodcoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Bode v. BodeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Jones v. EwartNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Bode v. BodeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992