In re Winsor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
By decision dated May 4, 1992, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of six months, effective immediately (see, Matter of Winsor, 183 AD2d 936). He now applies for reinstatement.
Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, re*868spondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.
Weiss, P. J., Yesawich Jr., Crew III,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re WinsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re WinsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re WinsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re WinsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011