Legal Opinion

In re Winsor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982 and maintains a law office in the City of Oneonta, Otsego County.

Having received no answer or other reply to a petition of charges filed against respondent, petitioner moved for a default judgment thereon. Thereafter, respondent submitted an affirmation in mitigation in which he also consents to an order of this Court sustaining the charges. Under such circumstances, we grant petitioner’s motion and find respondent guilty of the charged misconduct except insofar as the charges allege a violation of Code of Professional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WinsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re WinsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re WinsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re WinsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API