Wener v. Pope
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Clarke
Affirming;
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident at the southwest corner of Third and Jefferson streets, in the city of Louisville. A trial before' a jury resulted’ in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
His only complaints are that instructions Nos.' 1 and 3 given by the court ■ are prejudicially erroneous. The first instruction reads :
“1. It was the duty of Pope to exercise ordinary care to avoid collision with any person on the street, and that duty included the duties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weidner v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- United Casket Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Caines v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Major Taylor & Co. v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Melville v. RollwageCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Trevillian v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Lieberman v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Knecht v. BuckshornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Wilder v. CadleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Trainor's Administrator v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.