Legal Opinion

Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. Moorhead

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1966No. 6822PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Justice.

This is an action for damages to plaintiffs’ land because of the diversion of the West San Jacinto River by defendant from plaintiffs’ land. Trial was by jury and judgment was rendered for plaintiffs upon such jury issues. The parties will be designated here as they were in the trial court.

Plaintiffs alleged that in 1961 and 1962 defendant permanently diverted the flow of the West San Jacinto River from their 1206.32 acres tract of land by constructing an artificial channel and dam, without consent of the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs alleged this deprived plaintiffs of their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Schutz v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Massie v. HutchisonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bily v. Omni Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Courtesy Pontiac, Inc. v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Solomon v. Steitler, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  4. Gerstner v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Palmer v. FuquaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API