Schutz v. Morris
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BAUGH, Justice.
Appeal is from a judgment, based upon a special issue verdict, in favor of appellees against appellants for both actual and exemplary damages occasioned by the conduct of appellants in removing, without legal authority and without their knowledge or consent, the personal property and effects of appellees- from the room rented and occupied by them in the City of Austin.
We do not understand appellants to deny that they acted without legal authority; nor that they are liable for actual damages. The only contention here made in that regard is that the evidence will not support the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennett v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Wright Titus, Inc. v. SwaffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Walker v. KellarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Estate of Arrington v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Molex, Incorporated v. James Nolen and James Nolen D/B/A Western CableCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Russell v. TruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.