Legal Opinion
Jamal v. Gohel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 17, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiffs appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated March 18, 2004, as, upon a jury verdict finding the defendant 51% at fault in the happening of the accident and awarding them the sum of $400,000 for past pecuniary loss and $0 for future pecuniary *588loss, denied that branch of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) which was to set aside the verdict as to damages for future pecuniary loss as against the weight of the evidence and to grant a new trial on that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Barry v. ManglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Delacruz v. Galaxy ElectronicsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bleiberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Smith v. SheehyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- O'Brien v. BarrettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Gunther v. MuschioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- McAdams v. EspositoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006