Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Bango
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 4, 1996No. 00117PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
In this case we determine, inter alia, that the trial court did not err when it permitted the jury during deliberations to review transcripts of audio tapes. The audio tapes were properly admitted at trial. We affirm.
Appellant David John Bango appeals from the judgment of sentence following a jury trial in which appellant was found guilty of twenty-three (23) counts of Possession with Intent to Deliver a Controlled Substance. 35 P.S. § 780-01, et seq. He was also found guilty of one count of Criminal Conspiracy, 18 Pa.C.S. § 903.
Appellant asserts the trial court abused its…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Jimmy Lee Nixon, Richard Nixon, Michael Parks, Emmitt Lamar Manns, Henry L. Manns, Michael Keeley, Gerald WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Commonwealth v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. LilliockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. StrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BangoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.