Legal Opinion
Chilton v. National Cash Register Company
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 1, 1974No. Civ. 4363PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial made pursuant to Rule 38, Fed.R.Civ.P. Both parties have submitted memoranda on the issue raised, i. e., whether the right to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment of the United States Constitution embraces an action for damages, lost wages and benefits, liquidated damages, costs and attorney fees brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1970).
This question is one of first impression for this Court and neither the Court nor the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Quinn v. Bowmar Publishing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- Wehr v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- 14 Fair empl.prac.cas. 518, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,466, 1 Employee Benefits Ca 1537 Gladys E. Rogers and Margaret A. Rogers, as Co-Executrices of the Estate of Dilworth T. Rogers, in No. 76-1115, Cross-Appellants in No. 76-1114 v. Exxon Research and Engineering Company, a Delaware Corporation, in No. 76-1115, Cross-Appellee in No. 76-1114Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.