Allied Productions, Inc. v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
The appellants’ brief in this court urges that the questions for decision are whether (a) they were properly served in the Virginia action, and (b) whether they are now entitled to assert by cross action that the Virginia judgment was obtained by fraud, i. e. a conspiracy between their Virginia counsel and that of the plaintiff.
As to service, the trial court in Virginia explicitly found that there was service under Virginia’s long arm statute (§ 8-81.3 of the 1950 Code of Va. as amended). This was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Virginia. The statute has been held constitutional:…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dyal v. DyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crosby v. WenzoskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Colodny v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- International Systems, Inc. v. Bladen CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Crosby v. WenzoskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982