Wood v. Wood
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtWyatt, J.
The general demurrer raises the question whether or not the plaintiff, since his petition shows that he has a guardian, can maintain this petition brought in his own name. Of course it is a well-settled rule of law that, if he is mentally incompetent and has a duly appointed guardian, ordinarily all actions on his behalf must be brought by the guardian. See Code, § 37-1003. It is contended that this rule does not apply, for the reason that the petition shows the guardian to have been a special guardian. The language of the petition is as follows: “That said petition [for guardianship] was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Thompson v. TolmieSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Thomas v. MorrisettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Champion v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Korn v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Crosby v. WenzoskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.