Legal Opinion

Wood v. Wood

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 8, 1946No. 15454, 15455PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWyatt, J.

The general demurrer raises the question whether or not the plaintiff, since his petition shows that he has a guardian, can maintain this petition brought in his own name. Of course it is a well-settled rule of law that, if he is mentally incompetent and has a duly appointed guardian, ordinarily all actions on his behalf must be brought by the guardian. See Code, § 37-1003. It is contended that this rule does not apply, for the reason that the petition shows the guardian to have been a special guardian. The language of the petition is as follows: “That said petition [for guardianship] was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Thompson v. TolmieSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Thomas v. MorrisettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Champion v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Korn v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Crosby v. WenzoskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API