Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 30, 1983No. CA 83-273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

In this Workers’ Compensation case, the Commission denied appellant’s claim for benefits. We do not reach appellant’s contention that the Commission’s findings and decision are not supported by substantial evidence because we reverse for another reason.

Appellee, Tyson Foods, initially accepted appellant’s claim that he suffered a compensable back injury. It later denied benefits after learning appellant had suffered a back injury before working for Tyson, but had applied for employment with Tyson without disclosing his prior in-j ury. Appellant subsequently filed his claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shippers Transport of Georgia v. SteppSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. St. Paul Insurance v. TouzinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Davis v. C & M Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Potlatch Forests v. FunkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Browning's Restaurant v. KuykendallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Joseph's Mercy Medical Center v. RedmondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Loosey v. Osmose Wood Preserving Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Steak House v. WeigelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API