Legal Opinion

Prendergast v. Walls

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1917No. Appeal, No. 63PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal, No. 63, Jan. T., 1917, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1916, No. 2748, in equity, granting injunction restraining erection and maintenance of garage in case of Most Rev. Edmond F. Prendergast, Anne W. Penfield, Samuel Castner, Jr., Charles W. Naulty, James F. Conway, the Rector, the Church Wardens and Yestry of the Protestant Episcopal Church of the Saviour, Meredith Hanna, Rev. and Mrs. C. E. Milner, William Gr.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 63, Jan. T., 1917, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1916, No. 2748, in equity, granting injunction restraining erection and maintenance of garage in case of Most Rev. Edmond F. Prendergast, Anne W. Penfield, Samuel Castner, Jr., Charles W. Naulty, James F. Conway, the Rector, the Church Wardens and Yestry of the Protestant Episcopal Church of the Saviour, Meredith Hanna, Rev. and Mrs. C. E. Milner, William Gr. Hopper, Mr. and Mrs. McDonald, Estate of Mary V. Hanna, and the Heirs of Isabella M. Howell, Deceased, v. Walter Walls, John H.…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This appeal is dismissed and the decree affirmed, at appellants’ costs, on the sixteenth, twenty-first, twenty-second and twenty-third facts found by the learned chancellor below, which were followed by three correct legal conclusions.

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. Sun Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Phillips v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Hunter v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Burke v. HollingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Hohl v. ModellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API