Legal Opinion

George F. Russell, Inc. v. Hickcox

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

A partnership under the name of Thier-mann-Russell Company had existed for some years prior to 1924. The partnership had a broker’s license to transact business for’the year 1924. In January, 1924, a corporation was organized by the partners, under the same name as used by the partners; the same persons became officers of the corporation, save the fact that they took in their respective wives as qualifying directors.

All the assets of the partnership were turned over to the corporation in exchange for stock in the corporation, and the partnership went out of business.

The corporation wrote the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Payne v. VolkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Paulson v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hickey v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Nutting v. Minnesota Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Golden v. MeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. CapriWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hancock Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API