Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Slater
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1899No. 9977PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
At a former term the judgment of the district court' was affirmed. (Bradley v. Slater, 55 Neb. 334, 75 N. W. Rep. 826.) A rehearing was afterward allowed and the cause has been again argued and submitted. Of the points discussed on the re-argument it will be necessary to consider only the authority of the court to grant Slater’s motion for a new trial filed more than three days after the rendition of the judgment against him. A reexamination of this question has satisfied us that the conclusion announced in the former opinion is correct, and we adhere to it. Courts of general jurisdiction…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fox v. MeachamNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Williams v. Circuit Court of St. Louis countySupreme Court of Missouri · 1838
- Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. RitnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Bradley v. SlaterNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Greenberg v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Morrison v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Netusil v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Lyman v. DunnNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Emry v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.