Legal Opinion

Mesagate Homeowners' Ass'n v. City of Fernley

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2008No. 50994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Parraguirre, J.:

Appellants, David and Sandra Mathewson, Jack and Mary Knowles, and Shirley Fraser — all of whom own property along Mesa Drive — and the Mesagate Homeowners’ Association (collectively “Mesagate”) petitioned the district court for a writ of mandamus revoking respondent City of Fernley’s building permit for a water treatment plant. The district court denied Mesagate’s writ petition, concluding that Mesagate’s alleged harm did not support extraordinary writ relief. Mesagate now appeals the order denying its writ petition.

On appeal, the City contends that,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosenstein v. SteeleNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Kay v. NunezNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Doe v. BryanNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Secretary of State v. STATE LEGISLATURENevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Allstate Insurance v. ThorpeNevada Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BENSON VS. STATE ENGINEERNevada Supreme Court · 2015
  2. BENSON VS. STATE ENGINEERNevada Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Cabrera v. Service Employees International UnionDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  4. RENO REAL ESTATE DEVEL., LLC v. SCENIC NEVADA, INC. C/W 87549Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Scenic Nevada, Inc. Vs. City Of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API