Dittmer v. Bath
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Carpenter, J. Bill by Herman Dittmer against Charles Bath and Cornelia R. Schenck to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree subjecting the lien to a mortgage held by defendant Schenck, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The complainant erected a building upon premises owned by Bath, finishing the same upon December 10, 1893, his contract having been made on October 2, 1893. On December 1, 1893, and while the complainant was at work under his contract, Schenck took a mortgage upon the premises. On January 30, 1894, complainant filed a lien upon the premises for $373. A stipulation was filed at the hearing, dated March 30, 1896, signed by the solicitor of the defendant Bath, admitting the regularity of all proceedings to enforce the lien, and consenting to a decree for the sum of $333, with interest from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barnard v. McLeodMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Wiltsie v. HarveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Martin v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kerr-Murray Manufacturing Co. v. Kalamazoo Heat, Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Holliday v. MathewsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- McMillan v. SchneiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Wildey v. GillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Adams v. Central City Granite Brick & Block Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.