Martin v. Warren
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Adams, J., presiding. Bill by James J. Martin and others against Charles W. Warren, Kitty M. O’Donnell, and others, to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainants, defendant O’Donnell appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
This case is ruled by Sterner v. Haas, 108 Mich. 488. It is contended that it should not-be held to fall within the spirit, although within the letter, because in the present case more than 60 days had elapsed after the full completion of the work by the contractor at the time the hill was filed, and hence there was no chance for a lien to be perfected and enforced against said premises by subcontractors, laborers, or material men. If this contention is sound, the landowner must determine, at his peril, when said 60 days expires. If he *585be convinced by tbe contractor that the time has expired,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sterner v. HaasMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barnard v. McLeodMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Wiltsie v. HarveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Dittmer v. BathMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Holliday v. MathewsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Vander Horst v. Kalamazoo Apartments Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.