Legal Opinion

Warren v. Garlipp

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

December 2, 1911, the defendant herein, under section 70 of the Domestic Relations Law,* instituted a habeas corpus proceeding in the Supreme Court, Erie county, procuring a writ therein requiring Charles Rendee and Mary Rendee, the parents of Florence Rendee Garlipp, defendant’s wife, to produce Elmer F. Garlipp, the infant son of defendant and his said wife.

Upon the.return of the writ, and upon the moving papers, the writ and return thereto, a referee was appointed by the court who heard the testimony of the parties and reported his findings; among other things finding that the infant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Matter of LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Pearson v. LovejoyNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Belfer v. LudlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. In re MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API