Legal Opinion

Porter v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1993No. CR 93-1158PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Ronald Porter, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk requesting permission to file an untimely petition for review. Because our rule on motions for rule on clerk, Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 2-2, provides for belated appeals rather than belated review of decisions of the court of appeals, we treat the motion as a petition for belated review.

In this criminal case, the movant’s convictions were affirmed by the court of appeals on September 22, 1993. Porter v. State, 43 Ark. App. 110, 861 S.W.2d 122 (1993). Porter wished to seek a review by this court. However, Porter’s attorney,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Colyer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morales v. MartinezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API