Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 10, 1998No. CR 98-908Published

1Per curiam

Appellant’s counsel, Stuart Vess, files a motion to withdraw and requests that attorney Joe Don Winning-ham be substituted in his place. Mr. Vess’s motion is granted. Appellant moves for the belated review of the court of appeals, division III, decision issued on May 27, 1998. Appellant asserts that, until June 30, 1998, he was unaware of the court of appeals’ May 27 opinion, and seeks a belated review. See Porter v. State, 315 Ark. 160, 865 S.W.2d 300 (1993). We grant the petitioner’s request to file a belated petition.

Petitioner and his substituted counsel have filed a petition for review,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API