Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1933No. Docket No. 1762PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant Sam Thomas and one Joseph Matlock were jointly charged with the murder of John Buck, a police officer. Defendant Sam Thomas moved for a separate trial, which motion was denied. The jury found Joseph Matlock guilty of murder in the first degree with recommendation of life imprisonment and found defendant Sam Thomas guilty of murder in the second degree. From the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant Sam Thomas appeals.

Appellant contends: (1) That the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; (2) that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Branch v. FaustIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People v. ErnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Bennett and Holiman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API