Legal Opinion

Cowden v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 25, 1956No. 13021PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

W. H. Bell sued George Cowden and his children, hereinafter called Cowdens, in trespass to try title and obtained a summary judgment for title to a V12 mineral interest in lands. The legal question presented is whether Bell, the grantee under a deed from Cowden, is estopped from claiming under the deed because of his subsequent oral agreement not to record the deed and to treat the deed as inoperative. The trial court held that the oral agreement could not operate as a re-conveyance in the face of the Statute of Conveyances, Art. 1288, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., and the Statute of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ann Berta Lodge, No. 42 v. LevertonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Burnett v. AtteberryTexas Supreme Court · 1912

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cowden v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Noell v. Crow-Billingsley Air Park Ltd. Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  3. United States v. LesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. Allen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
  5. Bobbie White v. Josefino Bencomo III, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API