Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 1

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1933No. 9025PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This is the second appeal of this case. The first appeal was 'by writ of error. The majority opinion of this court is reported in 14 S.W.(2d) 321. See, also. 6 S.W.(2d) 231. The opinion of Section A, Oommissicm of Appeals-, is-reported in 25 S.W.(2d) 813, 819.

The written instrument out of which this controversy arose is set out in full in hiec verba in both of said opinions, and will not be recopied here.

The all-important question in this appeal is, Have the appellants proceeded under this optional contract to such an extent as to amount to an exercise of the option extended,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Ogden & Johnson v. BosseTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kempner v. HuddlestonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Weatherford, Mineral Wells & Northwestern Railway Co. v. GrangerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Roberts v. ArmstrongTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greever v. PerskyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Thompson v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Martin v. LottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. State Board of Water Engineers v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API