Legal Opinion

Nester v. Church

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Houghton; Haire, J., presiding. Petition by George Nester and others against Frank E. Church and Roscoe D. Dix, auditor general, to set aside a tax sale. From an order granting the prayer of the petition, respondent Church appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The following statement of facts is taken from the brief of counsel for respondent Church: August 31, 1894, the auditor general filed the usual petition for the sale of lands delinquent for taxes for 1892 and previous years, in the circuit court for Houghton county, in chancery. On the same day the usual order was made, fixing the date of hearing November 5, 1894. This, with the petition, was duly published in the Portage Lake Mining Gazette, a newspaper published at Houghton. Proof of publication was subsequently filed, and a final decree *82made in the statutory form November 22, 1894. The tax…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Muirhead v. SandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Auditor General v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Spaulding v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hughes v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Ball v. Ridge Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Church v. NesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API