Legal Opinion
Schenck v. Orosz
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 20, 2015No. Case No. 3:13-cv-00294PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Contempt for Violation of Preliminary Injunction Order (Docket No. 114), to which the defendants have filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 127), and the plaintiffs have filed a Reply (Docket No. 132). The plaintiffs have also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 116), to which the defendants have filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 135), and the plaintiffs have filed a Reply (Docket No. 141). For the reasons stated herein, the Motion for Contempt will be denied, the Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Advisers, Incorporated v. Wiesen-Hart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by10 opinions
- Palmer/Kane LLC v. Rosen Book Works LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Roberts v. GordyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Energy Intelligence Grp., Inc. v. CHS McPherson Refinery, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Brunson v. Capitol CMG, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Chambers v. Green-StubbsDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.