Legal Opinion

Ankush Sehgal v. Loretta Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 22, 2016No. 15-2334PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from an unusual immigration case that was filed properly in the district court. Plaintiffs Mohit and Ankush Sehgal filed an “1-130” petition seeking lawful permanent resident status for Mohit, who is a citizen of India, as the husband of Ankush, who is a citizen of the United States. Immigration authorities denied their petition on the ground that Mohit had tried years earlier to gain lawful residence in the United States by a fraudulent marriage to another woman. That made him ineligible for relief even though his marriage to Ankush is legitimate.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Goran Mudric v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Ruiz v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Rajah v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zizi v. BausmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Owusu-Boakye v. BarrDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
  3. Naiker v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
  4. Agbodji v. GarlandDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2025
  5. Al Khader v. TillersonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API