Legal Opinion
Bertone Commissioning v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered May 27, 2004, which denied plaintiffs application for an extension of time to serve a notice of claim on defendant New York City Transit Authority, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, plaintiffs application granted, and the notice of claim served April 16, 2003 deemed timely served nunc pro tunc.
On November 18, 2002, plaintiff, a 76-year-old messenger, was allegedly injured when, as he was walking in front of 73 Worth Street in Manhattan, he stepped upon a yellow metal cellar door/gate in the sidewalk and it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Porcaro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Lopez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Lopez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Meacham v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Thomas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014