Legal Opinion
Stutes v. Tipton
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided February 8, 2008No. 2:07-cr-00066PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J. GARVAN MURTHA, District Judge.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation was filed January 9, 2008 (Paper 32). After de novo review and over objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Paper 19) is GRANTED in part. All claims against defendants Hofmann and Oddy are DISMISSED. The Court hereby transfers the remainder of this case, including all pending motions, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406.
WHEREFORE, it is hereby
ORDERED,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Huey B. Wright v. Harold Smith and Thomas A. Coughlin, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Colon v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. PallitoDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013