Legal Opinion

Collingsworth v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 9, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

77 So.2d 843 (1955)

John COLLINGSWORTH, Petitioner,

v.

Nathan MAYO, as Prison Custodian of the State of Florida, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

February 9, 1955.

John Collingsworth, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Moie J.L. Tendrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

SEBRING, Justice.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding in which the petitioner challenges the legality of the judgment and sentence under which he is presently imprisoned.

From the petition, the return, and the traverse to the return, it appears that on September 24, 1945, the petitioner was charged, in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. State Ex Rel. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Carnagio v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. In Re J. R. CampSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Pinkney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BatehSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Bateh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Helton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. Bouie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Bascelio v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API