Legal Opinion

In Re J. R. Camp

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 5, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

In habeas corpus proceedings it appears that in the Criminal Court of Record for Orange County, J. R. Camp and J. Y. Sanders were charged with the larceny of a Ford touring car automobile. At the trial “the court instructed the jury that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant them in bringing in a verdict of guilty against J. V. Sanders, and therefore they must deal solely with J. R. Camp.” The verdict was: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty as charged. So say we all.” The court rendered the following judgment:'

“Now on this day came in person the defendant, J. R. Camp in open court,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte SimmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. New Mexico State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bouie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Collingsworth v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Bascelio v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Smith v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API