Legal Opinion

United States v. Rivera Construction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 15, 1988No. Nos. 88-5165, 88-5166PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Joseph Rivera and Rivera Construction Company (“RCC”) appeal from their convictions of various offenses involving a conspiracy to defraud the United States Department of Defense (“DOD”). Their principal contention is that their rights under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S. C. §§ 3161-3174 (1982), were violated by the district court’s decision to order a continuance following disqualification of RCC’s original trial counsel. We conclude that all of appellants’ claims lack merit and we will affirm the convictions.

*294I.

Under the supervision of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Elfman Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corporation, Chrysler Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Leasing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Reginald McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. State v. Spencer Gifts, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. United States v. David FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Patrick Asubonteng, Also Known as Patrick RiversCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Duberry, Leslie. Appeal of Leslie DuberryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API