Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murphy

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 23, 1973PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

The defendants, Murphy and Tilley, after trial subject to G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, were found guilty by the trial judge sitting without a jury on separate indictments of burning a dwelling house. G. L. c. 266, § 1. Each defendant appeals, and argues only an assignment of error based on the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. Each contends that the Commonwealth failed to introduce a sufficient amount of evidence to warrant a finding of guilty. Therefore, we review the evidence in detail.

There was testimony that on November 7, 1970, at about 7:30 p.m., Michael D.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. John L. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. BonomiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Commonwealth v. BendersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MangulaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. DrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. AmaralMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. WalterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API