Commonwealth v. Amaral
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
The defendant appeals from a conviction on an indictment charging armed robbery while masked (G. L. c. 265, § 17). She assigns as error the denial of her motion for a required finding of not guilty. We affirm the judgment.
In reviewing the denial of a motion for a required finding of not guilty in a criminal case, we consider whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth (Commonwealth v. Sandler, 368 Mass. 729, 740 [1975]), and with permissible inferences therefrom, was sufficient with respect to each essential element of the offense to have “satisfied a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. CasaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. CoteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SeminaraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SaezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.