Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Amaral

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 25, 1982PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

The defendant appeals from a conviction on an indictment charging armed robbery while masked (G. L. c. 265, § 17). She assigns as error the denial of her motion for a required finding of not guilty. We affirm the judgment.

In reviewing the denial of a motion for a required finding of not guilty in a criminal case, we consider whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth (Commonwealth v. Sandler, 368 Mass. 729, 740 [1975]), and with permissible inferences therefrom, was sufficient with respect to each essential element of the offense to have “satisfied a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. CasaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. FancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. CoteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. SeminaraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. SaezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API