Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Buchanan District Court. — Hon. John J. .Ney, Judge. Action for divorce. The relief demanded was denied, and judgment was rendered in favor of defendant for costs. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

— Defendant was married to plaintiff on the fifteenth day of September, 1886, and on the eighth day of April, 1887, left him. The evidence shows without conflict that the desertion was wilful, *30and without any cause recognized in law. It had continued inore than two years, when this action was commenced. She made no complaint of plaintiff, excepting that to one witness she stated that “she did not think the plaintiff loved her.” Another witness testified that “ there seemed to be no affection between them.” However much the want of affection between the parties is to be deplored, it is not in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Appeals of DetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Lane v. LaneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bunger v. BungerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API