Legal Opinion

Guardian Depositors Corp. v. Hebb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1939No. Docket No. 75, Calendar No. 40,373PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover a deficiency claimed to be due upon a note and mortgage after foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged property by advertisement. Plaintiff was the owner and holder, for value, of the note and mortgage in question, and purchased and acquired the premises at mortgage sale. The note and mortgage were given by defendant April 25, 1927, for $15,000, due three years after date. The property in question was sold at mortgage foreclosure sale for $7,500, and plaintiff claims the amount due on the covenant to pay included in the mortgage, with interest to March 15,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Honeyman v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Paepcke v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Clinton v. Clinton's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bank of Three Oaks v. Lakefront PropertiesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Guardian Depositors Corp. v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Bank of Florence v. Miller (In Re Miller)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. Talmer Bank & Trust v. ParikhMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API