Legal Opinion

Bekins v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1918No. Civ. No. 2514PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover possession of certain real property described in the complaint, alleging that the defendant unlawfully detained the same. In the complaint it was alleged that under the lease or agreement made between the parties the defendant occupied the relation of tenant at will toward the plaintiff. It was further alleged that the requisite notices required by the code had been given to terminate the tenancy. The answer -filed by the defendant put in issue all of the material matters alleged in the complaint. Findings and judgment were in favor of the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Husheon v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bakersfield Town Hall Ass'n v. ChesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Johnson v. ChelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Norris v. LillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Manning v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bekins v. TrullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Green v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Halloran v. IsaacsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API