Stern v. Ward
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following memorandum was filed by Mr. Justice Trenehard: “The plaintiff in the District Court below [the prosecutor here] sued out a writ of replevin and took possession of an automobile. The defendants put in a bond, retained possession of the car, and filed a claim of property, and in that way the matter proceeded to trial and judgment for the defendant Abram B. Lane in the District Court.
Read the full summary
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following memorandum was filed by Mr. Justice Trenehard: “The plaintiff in the District Court below [the prosecutor here] sued out a writ of replevin and took possession of an automobile. The defendants put in a bond, retained possession of the car, and filed a claim of property, and in that way the matter proceeded to trial and judgment for the defendant Abram B. Lane in the District Court. “At the trial it appeared, as will be hereinafter shown, that the plaintiff leased the automobile to the defendant Franklin A. Ward; that the defendant…
1Per curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchaxd in the Supreme Court.
*281For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Svayze, Barker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black., White, Heppenheimer, Wllliams, Taylor, Gardner, Acicerson, JJ. 14.
For reversal—Alone.
2Cited by3 opinions
- General Electric Capital Auto Lease v. ViolanteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- General Electric Capital Auto Lease v. ViolanteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Post v. LloydUnited States District Court · 1935