Legal Opinion

General Electric Capital Auto Lease v. Violante

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 10, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KESTIN, P.J.A.D.

In July 1999, plaintiff, General Electric Capital Auto Lease (GECAL), sued Alfonso Violante alleging breach of an installment sales contract for a Lexus automobile and asserting a “perfected security interest” in the ear.2 In a separate count of the complaint, GECAL also sued David’s Towing Service and David Brigati, Jr. t/a David’s Towing Service (collectively, “David’s”) for possession of the car, alleging that it had been taken to David’s at Violante’s behest and that it was being wrongfully held as security for the payment of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auto Security Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  2. Bruce G. M. Diesel, Inc. v. Associates Financial Services Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Stern v. WardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. Stern v. PayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  5. AKC, INC. v. Joel Opatut Family TrustNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Electric Capital Auto Lease v. ViolanteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API