Legal Opinion
D. M. Rose & Co. v. Dysart
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided May 23, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFaw, P. J.
R. S. Dysart, a building contractor at Knoxville, under a contract with AY. H. Sterchi, built for him an apartment house on his (Sterchi’s) lot in Knoxville. He failed to pay the bill of D. M. Rose & Company, amounting to $455.53, for materials furnished and used in the building, .and said D. M. Rose & Company instituted this suit against Dysart and Sterchi to enforce its lien.
Sterchi filed a cross-bill against Dysart and the New York Indemnity .Companj'', alleging that the former had executed an indemnity or contractor’s bond with the latter as surety obligating Dysart to pay for all…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Insurance Company v. McCainSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Aetna Life Insurance v. FallowTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Ruggles v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- O'Shea v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & L. ASS'N OF COLUMBIATennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- American National Insurance Company v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
- Corbitt v. Federal Kemper Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Lovell v. Sonitrol of Chattanooga, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983